(Days Hr:Min:Sec) |
Dear Mr. President,
I am truly honored that you chose to take time out of your busy busy schedule to
read my e-mail. I am not yet old enough to vote, but I follow politics and read
many political books. I would be greatly honored if you could lend some of you
time, and energy to answer a few simple questions. One of my questions is about
the media. As the President, you have the power to ultimately control the
country. Many high offices in your administration and so of your strong follower
have expressed concern about the medias liberal bias. Now I may be mistaken, but
wouldn't that mean that the news and newspapers and news magazines lean mainly
to the left and away from you and your ideas? Listening to the TV news (FOX as
well as CNN, NBC, and ABC) found that the majority of the media is very much in
agreement with your administration, so much to the point that the featured
guests are all far from this "liberal bias." Magazines such as
NEWSWEEK and TIME also seem to support you enough to twist facts in your favor.
This confused me because you and your supports seemed so sure of this
"liberal bias" that is had to be true. So I sat at this very computer
where I am now typing this e-mail and I did some homework. What I found was
quite a shock. It turned out that the large majority os these news stations were
owned by two or three people. I was no stranger to that power pyramid, but I
still had that patriotic hope that at least my news came from many different
sources, giving me the whole picture. Upon further reading, I discovered that
most of these corporate overlords were not left-leaning at all, and actually
very much RIGHT. Mr. President, with all due respect, I feel it is immoral and
also very un-American to have such a small range of sources from which to get
news and is the circle is small, it should at least be politically balanced. I
would very much like to hear your view on this monopoly before the november
elections.
My other question has to do with Iraq. I have no doubt you get countless e-mails
both praising and criticizing this war. My letter is one mixing the two. First
and foremost, I congratulate you and thank you for ridding the world of an evil
man. Saddam was a bad man and anyone who says otherwise is defiantly off. My
problem is HOW and WHEN you chose to get him. You and your administration told a
lot of lie to start this war on justify it. I would be pleased if you would
admit it now that it has become apparent to at least part of the country. It
troubles me to know every morning when I get up for school that my government
will not even admit to a lie. President Clinton also lied, as you know very
well. His lie was not nearly as troubling because whether or not he had slept
with Ms. Lewinsky had and still has no effect on the American people. With all
due respect, the lies you told where much worse and costed many young people
from around the world their lives. One of these lies got the lier impeached. The
other president got the war and still has not told the people that he lied.
There is nothing anyone can do now to bring back all those innocent people, but
we can let their families know the truth about why they lost a sister, brother,
cousin, uncle, aunt, father, or mother, and a friend. Maybe America should know
also because they are paying for the war. My family may not be physically in
Iraq, but I know that our tax money is. This is the same for most of America,
but sadly most of them no not why their money is being used in Iraq, and why
their family and friends are dying. Mr. Bush, you and I both know that there are
no weapons of mass distruction in Iraq, and the only chemical and biological
weapons that were ever there, were give to Saddam by the US of A. All of those
such weapons are now gone.
Very curious
Sophie Solomon
Pikesville, MD 21208
Daniel E. LOEB, eMail: daniel.loeb at verizon.net